Product image pending

We track images separately from defect reports.

Home & Garden

Shark HV371

1 source-linked failure report. Most reported: Fire / ignition. Typical failure around 11 mo.

Reliability signal — · Insufficient data · data confidence Very Low

1 confirmed failure reports

Reliability summary

What is likely to go wrong, when it happens, and how expensive it can be — from source-linked failure reports. Counts are reports in our database, not a population failure rate.

Reliability signal

—

1 confirmed failure report · Insufficient data · Data confidence: Very Low

Need at least 5 confirmed failure-signal reports before showing an A–F grade.

Most common issue
Fire / ignition
Typical first failure
11 mo
Median of confirmed reports with timing
Median repair cost
—
Reported costs only · market varies
Highest reported repair
—
Not a quote · costs differ by country

What breaks?

Failure types

Click a type in the reports section below to filter.

  • Fire / ignition1 · 100%

When does it break?

Failure timing

Months after purchase, using reports that included timing.

What does it cost?

Reported repair costs

Distribution of owner-reported repair costs— not a quote or guarantee. Labor and parts prices vary by country.

No reported repair costs yet for this model.

Median months to failure

11

Failure reports

1

View →

Median repair cost

—

Still recommend

—

% repaired

—

% mfr warranty

—

% extended warranty

—

% support helpful

—

Use these reports as a risk signal, then check current listings before you buy.

Search this model on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, After Warranty may earn from qualifying purchases.

What breaks?

What breaks? · reports

Fire / ignition

Vacuum Cleaners (115)

11 months

Government / agencyIndexed Oct 16, 2026Source-linkedVerify source — SaferProducts.gov incident

SaferProducts.gov consumer incident report 20260618-C46DA-6104761. Severity: Incident, No Injury. Product: shark HV371 (shark rocket vacuum). Incident: On August 25, the customer reported that their vacuum unit powered on by itself without any user interaction. Shortly after turning on, the device produced smoke and visible flames. The vacuum became non-functional as a result of the incident. Following this report, the company provided the customer with a replacement unit. On June 26, the replacement vacuum experienced the same malfunction, turning on independently, followed again by smoke and flames, leading to a second device failure. The customer reports no unusual use or modifications to either unit. Hazard Description: Uncommented device activation Electrical overheating Smoke emission Presence of flames Complete device failure The consumer is requesting that this product be considered for recall, stating that the repeated malfunction poses a serious fire hazard. According to the consumer, two separate units of the same product have exhibited the same dangerous behavior�turning on without activation, producing smoke and flames, and ultimately failing. Given these repeated incidents, the consumer believes that the product represents a risk to public safety and asserts that the issue should be formally addressed by the appropriate authorities.

UnverifiedEvidence ★★★★☆
View report details

Months until failure

11 months

Repair cost

Not stated

Repaired

Not stated

Manufacturer warranty

Not stated

Extended warranty

Not stated

Support helpful

Not stated

Would recommend

Not stated

AI extraction confidence

88%

Verification status

Unverified

Evidence quality

★★★★☆ (4/5)

Discussion

Compare nearby models

Similar products

Stay ahead of failures

Notify me about this model

Get an email when a new source-linked failure report is published for the Shark HV371.

We only email when a new published report is added for Shark HV371. No spam, unsubscribe by contacting support.

Contribute signal

Had a failure with this model?

Add your experience and help future shoppers understand what happens after the warranty.

Submit your experience